Skip to main content

Not Just for Students: Using a Feedback Loop to Improve Your Teaching Practice

We give our students a lot of feedback to guide their growth -- but do we do a good job of seeking and using feedback ourselves?

Over the winter break of 2015, I was somewhat startled to find myself searching the internet for career alternatives that would take me out of the classroom. I was feeling isolated in a room with students who didn’t want to engage with my class and was discouraged by a perceived lack of support from my administration.

After a little rest and outdoor time, and a lot of Netflix, I realized that I didn’t need a different career -- I needed more feedback. Tapping into my knowledge of the Engineering Design Cycle, I envisioned a Teacher Feedback Loop that I could use to grow as a teacher. 

the teacher feedback loop diagram


Observing a Problem

The course that prompted this realization was a physical science course, consisting of three sections of 15-17 eighth grade girls. The previous summer I had started the 3-year UW Physics By Inquiry Summer Institute. The institute was a transformative experience and I came away from it excited to try inquiry instruction in my class during the 2015-16 school year. I was hopped up on the energy that comes from a new, promising instructional strategy and, I hate to admit, a small dose of the ego that also comes from having "discovered" a promising new instructional strategy.  

Unfortunately, reality had other plans. By winter my students ranged from patiently tolerant to disengaged to downright defiant, and parents and administrators were starting to get involved. I was seeing clear signs of what Seidel & Tanner call Student Resistance in response to my new teaching style:

Behaviors and actions students take in a classroom situation when they become frustrated, upset, or disengaged from what is happening there.”

Getting Curious

Every time I thought about this class I felt defensive. I had a big problem and very little information. I realized that my attitude towards them was the same attitude they had towards me: we were all suffering from a lack of information. So I did for myself what any good scientist would do: I turned it into an experiment. 

This new perspective helped me switch my mindset from defensive to curious, and I decided to have my students take a survey. I designed a survey to answer the question:
What is the source of student resistance?
I made the survey anonymous but mandatory, asking them to check their name off a list when they completed it. I also shared my motivation for the survey with my classes:
“As students, you get feedback all day about how you are doing and how you can improve. As a teacher, I don’t get as much feedback -- but I want to improve! This is the way that you can help me make this a better class and become a better teacher.”
You'll notice that the questions are intentionally subjective:
  • What about this class feels fair/unfair?
  • What type of feedback do you get from Ms. Witcher? What additional feedback do you need?
  • Other comments?
I didn't just want a tally of objective statistics, I wanted to know about the experience that each student was having in the class. I was optimistic that I just had a few frustrated kids and that, overall, my students would report a good experience. The results were sobering. Again, I worked myself from despair to optimism like any good scientist: with cold, hard data analysis. Of the numerous potential causes for student resistance shared by Seidel & Tanner, I saw evidence for the following teacher misbehaviors:

Unfair testing

“It felt unfair when there were questions on the quiz which were not taught in class or even the videos and textbook because often times I prepared well for the tests but never got the grade I thought i deserved.”

Unresponsive to students’ questions

“It feels like you play favorites you don't answer questions unless they were super specific.”

Apathetic to students

I think that it is unfair how little class-to-teacher time we have. It feels like we are learning on our own, and not with a teacher, so there is really no point in the class at all. We could simply go online and learn everything that we learn in class.”

Taking Action

Armed with this wealth of data, I made a plan, choosing the most practical suggestions from Seidel & Tanner:

Decrease Social Distance between Yourself and Your StudentsBe Explicit with Students about the Reasoning behind Your Pedagogical ChoicesVary the Teaching Methods Used
Incorporating mini-conferencing through homework “check-ins” with each studentAsking students to do guided research and conclude, “What is the best way to learn science?”Incorporate peer review activities for writing assignments (this effort eventually turned into Flash Feedback!)
Giving more specific feedback on graded assessments (Floop has become a hugely useful tool for this effort!)Working with the science department to develop a system of standards-based assessmentStarting each unit with a more guided introductory activity
Laughing with my students moreExplaining the purpose of every assessment as it is assignedIncorporating authentic engineering design challenges

Staying Curious

I gradually rolled out these strategies throughout the second semester, and then I monitored and adjusted. I continued with surveys twice a year to check in on student attitudes and experiences, and I continued to adjust my instructional and assessment practices in response. It wasn’t an overnight success. I've realized that I need to adopt a modified version of the The Customer is Always Right attitude: Is it true that I play favorites and only answer some students' questions? No. Is it true that something was causing this student to feel that way? Yes.

Over the years, I've noticed some hopeful trends in the survey results.  Overall, there’s been a transition from feedback concerning me as a person, to feedback concerning the course (and general lamenting about the challenges inherent to learning).

The best trend I’ve noticed is that the students increasingly respond to survey questions as if we’re all on the same team:
The seating feels slightly unfair, but it is a very hard thing to figure out. I think it can also be sort of unfair when you can be trying really hard and being super on task, but then depending on whether or not the rest of the table is on task it can drag you down.”
“There are not very many aspects that feel unfair. When we bring things to attention to Ms. Witcher, they are always addressed in a fair way.”
This last school year, 2017-18, has been the best yet. I was ecstatic to see this graph at the end of the year:
three year survey results
Average student agreement: -2.0 = completely disagree, 2.0 = completely agree
...and to receive feedback like this:
"i had fun this year and enjoy knowing why stuff happens the way it does. thank you for a great year."
"this class is awesome!"
"it was a blast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Your Turn

Thinking ahead to next school year, how can you implement a Teacher Feedback Loop to improve your teaching practice? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below:
What problem are you going to be working on in your classroom?
How might you get feedback to inform solutions to that problem?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Part 2 - Tools for an Equitable Feedback System: Engaging with Criteria

This series of posts will cover a variety of bite-sized strategies that can be incorporated into a more holistic feedback system. To learn more about the research behind these approaches, we recommend you first read our white paper.

Part 1 - Feedback is Emotional



For feedback information to be useful, it must communicate:  Where am I going? (What are the goals?)How am I going? (What progress is being made toward the goal?)Where to next? (What activities need to be undertaken to make better progress?) (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).  Supporting students in engaging with the grading criteria helps give context to the feedback to come. In other words, it does the groundwork of helping them determine for themselves, "Where am I going?"


5-Minute Energizers to Activate You and Your Students

We're officially in the grind. I ask my teacher colleagues how they're doing, and the standard response is a sigh: "I'm really looking forward to catching up on grading over the 3-day weekend," "I'm counting down the days until Thanksgiving," "I have 20 letters of recommendation to write."
If we're feeling this way, our students are too! Here are super quick activities to inject energy back into your classroom: Snap, Stomp, Clap (Partners) Each person counts off to 3, i.e. Person A: "1", Person B: "2", Person A: "3", Person B: "1", etc. When everyone gets the hang of it, try it again, but replace 1's with a snap of the fingers (snap, 2, 3, snap, 2, 3, etc.) Do it again, but also replace 3's with a stomp (snap, 2, stomp, snap, 2, stomp, etc.) Do it again, but also replace 2's with a clap (snap, clap, stomp, snap, clap, stomp, etc.) Gift Giving Game (Partners) Person A pantomimes givin…

Floop Team & Dr. Naomi Winstone: What does the research say about feedback best practices?

Over winter break, Floop co-founder Melanie and I had the privilege of talking with prominent feedback researcher Dr. Naomi Winstone. Her research has discovered that feedback interventions all seem to target at least one of four metacognitive skills, described by the SAGE process, and hypothesizes that a holistic approach to developing feedback systems should target all four of the skills: Self-Appraisal: judging one's abilitiesAssessment Literacy: understanding the grading process, standards, and criteriaGoal-Setting & Self-Reflection: being goal-oriented and monitoring progress to meet outcomesEngagement & Motivation: having an attitude of receptiveness to performance information Essentially, for feedback to reach that level of effectiveness that we've heard from experts like Hattie & Timperly, students need to be motivated to engage with feedback and have the feedback literacy skills to use it, and the instructional environment must give them the agency to act …