Skip to main content

Not Just for Students: Using a Feedback Loop to Improve Your Teaching Practice

We give our students a lot of feedback to guide their growth -- but do we do a good job of seeking and using feedback ourselves?

Over the winter break of 2015, I was somewhat startled to find myself searching the internet for career alternatives that would take me out of the classroom. I was feeling isolated in a room with students who didn’t want to engage with my class and was discouraged by a perceived lack of support from my administration.

After a little rest and outdoor time, and a lot of Netflix, I realized that I didn’t need a different career -- I needed more feedback. Tapping into my knowledge of the Engineering Design Cycle, I envisioned a Teacher Feedback Loop that I could use to grow as a teacher. 

the teacher feedback loop diagram

Observing a Problem

The course that prompted this realization was a physical science course, consisting of three sections of 15-17 eighth grade girls. The previous summer I had started the 3-year UW Physics By Inquiry Summer Institute. The institute was a transformative experience and I came away from it excited to try inquiry instruction in my class during the 2015-16 school year. I was hopped up on the energy that comes from a new, promising instructional strategy and, I hate to admit, a small dose of the ego that also comes from having "discovered" a promising new instructional strategy.  

Unfortunately, reality had other plans. By winter my students ranged from patiently tolerant to disengaged to downright defiant, and parents and administrators were starting to get involved. I was seeing clear signs of what Seidel & Tanner call Student Resistance in response to my new teaching style:

Behaviors and actions students take in a classroom situation when they become frustrated, upset, or disengaged from what is happening there.”

Getting Curious

Every time I thought about this class I felt defensive. I had a big problem and very little information. I realized that my attitude towards them was the same attitude they had towards me: we were all suffering from a lack of information. So I did for myself what any good scientist would do: I turned it into an experiment. 

This new perspective helped me switch my mindset from defensive to curious, and I decided to have my students take a survey. I designed a survey to answer the question:
What is the source of student resistance?
I made the survey anonymous but mandatory, asking them to check their name off a list when they completed it. I also shared my motivation for the survey with my classes:
“As students, you get feedback all day about how you are doing and how you can improve. As a teacher, I don’t get as much feedback -- but I want to improve! This is the way that you can help me make this a better class and become a better teacher.”
You'll notice that the questions are intentionally subjective:
  • What about this class feels fair/unfair?
  • What type of feedback do you get from Ms. Witcher? What additional feedback do you need?
  • Other comments?
I didn't just want a tally of objective statistics, I wanted to know about the experience that each student was having in the class. I was optimistic that I just had a few frustrated kids and that, overall, my students would report a good experience. The results were sobering. Again, I worked myself from despair to optimism like any good scientist: with cold, hard data analysis. Of the numerous potential causes for student resistance shared by Seidel & Tanner, I saw evidence for the following teacher misbehaviors:

Unfair testing

“It felt unfair when there were questions on the quiz which were not taught in class or even the videos and textbook because often times I prepared well for the tests but never got the grade I thought i deserved.”

Unresponsive to students’ questions

“It feels like you play favorites you don't answer questions unless they were super specific.”

Apathetic to students

I think that it is unfair how little class-to-teacher time we have. It feels like we are learning on our own, and not with a teacher, so there is really no point in the class at all. We could simply go online and learn everything that we learn in class.”

Taking Action

Armed with this wealth of data, I made a plan, choosing the most practical suggestions from Seidel & Tanner:

Decrease Social Distance between Yourself and Your StudentsBe Explicit with Students about the Reasoning behind Your Pedagogical ChoicesVary the Teaching Methods Used
Incorporating mini-conferencing through homework “check-ins” with each studentAsking students to do guided research and conclude, “What is the best way to learn science?”Incorporate peer review activities for writing assignments (this effort eventually turned into Flash Feedback!)
Giving more specific feedback on graded assessments (Floop has become a hugely useful tool for this effort!)Working with the science department to develop a system of standards-based assessmentStarting each unit with a more guided introductory activity
Laughing with my students moreExplaining the purpose of every assessment as it is assignedIncorporating authentic engineering design challenges

Staying Curious

I gradually rolled out these strategies throughout the second semester, and then I monitored and adjusted. I continued with surveys twice a year to check in on student attitudes and experiences, and I continued to adjust my instructional and assessment practices in response. It wasn’t an overnight success. I've realized that I need to adopt a modified version of the The Customer is Always Right attitude: Is it true that I play favorites and only answer some students' questions? No. Is it true that something was causing this student to feel that way? Yes.

Over the years, I've noticed some hopeful trends in the survey results.  Overall, there’s been a transition from feedback concerning me as a person, to feedback concerning the course (and general lamenting about the challenges inherent to learning).

The best trend I’ve noticed is that the students increasingly respond to survey questions as if we’re all on the same team:
The seating feels slightly unfair, but it is a very hard thing to figure out. I think it can also be sort of unfair when you can be trying really hard and being super on task, but then depending on whether or not the rest of the table is on task it can drag you down.”
“There are not very many aspects that feel unfair. When we bring things to attention to Ms. Witcher, they are always addressed in a fair way.”
This last school year, 2017-18, has been the best yet. I was ecstatic to see this graph at the end of the year:
three year survey results
Average student agreement: -2.0 = completely disagree, 2.0 = completely agree
...and to receive feedback like this:
"i had fun this year and enjoy knowing why stuff happens the way it does. thank you for a great year."
"this class is awesome!"
"it was a blast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Your Turn

Thinking ahead to next school year, how can you implement a Teacher Feedback Loop to improve your teaching practice? I’d love to hear from you in the comments below:
What problem are you going to be working on in your classroom?
How might you get feedback to inform solutions to that problem?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Back-to-School: Consider Your Feedback System, Not Grading System

One question I ask other teachers is “How important is feedback in learning?” Every teacher I talk to agrees that feedback is crucial. It’s how both teacher and student gets better. Research backs the importance of feedback; building off of John Hattie’s work comparing factors on learning, Evidence for Learning’s toolkit ranks feedback as having the highest impact out of their 34 approaches (along with meta-cognition) with a +8 months’ impact on students’ learning progress. I follow the feedback question with “How important are grades in learning?” It might seem like a loaded question. You can imagine how teachers respond: “They’re not.” Why give grades, then? We’ll save that topic for another occasion. For now, I just want to point out that we are frequently asked to consider and describe our grading system by students, parents, colleagues, and administrators. We’re rarely asked about the much bigger and more important component of our work: feedback. With back-to-school qu

A Culture of Iteration: Policies and Practices for a Revision-FocusedClassroom

Success in the real world depends on a person's ability to iterate. to understand the definition of success on a task to seek feedback early and often to use that feedback to revise and refine until successful As teachers, its our job to scaffold this process, with developmentally-appropriate differentiation, until our students can fly solo. As I sit here writing this, my  SO  Dan is at his desk  red-lining  a building diagram for a warehouse in Canada. When he's done, the diagram will go back to his team of engineers where they will respond to Dan's feedback with a better design. They'll repeat this process until both building code and client requirements have been met. To do this work, which requires an iteration cycle that can last over a year or more, Dan has to understand building code and client needs, seek feedback from other engineers and the client, and use that feedback to revise and refine until the design is ready for implementation. ​Dan wasn'

Part 2 - Tools for an Equitable Feedback System: Engaging with Criteria

This series of posts will cover a variety of bite-sized strategies that can be incorporated into a more holistic feedback system. To learn more about the research behind these approaches, we recommend you first read our white paper . Part 1 - Feedback is Emotional For feedback information to be useful, it must communicate:  Where am I going? (What are the goals?) How am I going? (What progress is being made toward the goal?) Where to next? (What activities need to be undertaken to make better progress?) (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).  Supporting students in engaging with the grading criteria helps give context to the feedback to come. In other words, it does the groundwork of helping them determine for themselves, "Where am I going?"